Directives are similar to a WikiLink in form, except they
begin with ! and may contain parameters. The general
form is:
[[!directive param="value" param="value"]]
This gets expanded before the rest of the page is processed, and can be used to transform the page in various ways.
The quotes around values can be omitted if the value is a simple word. Also, some directives may use parameters without values, for example:
[[!tag foo]]
A directive does not need to all be on one line, it can be wrapped to multiple lines if you like:
[[!directive foo="baldersnatch"
bar="supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" baz=11]]
Also, multiple lines of quoted text can be used for a value. To allow quote marks inside the quoted text, delimit the block of text with triple-quotes:
[[!directive text="""
1. "foo"
2. "bar"
3. "baz"
"""]]
ikiwiki also has an older syntax for directives, which requires
a space in directives to distinguish them from wikilinks. This syntax has several
disadvantages: it requires a space after directives with no
parameters (such as [[pagecount ]]), and it prohibits
spaces in wikilinks.
ikiwiki now provides the !-prefixed syntax shown above
as default. However, ikiwiki still supports wikis using the older
syntax, if the prefix_directives option is
disabled.
Just a note: from now on some posts will be in English. I just want to make sure some of them are worlwide readable.
During DebConf8 I met
John Wright, who works in HP. He packages a couple of python
things, like trac-mercurial (currently in sid only),
and he offered to teach me how to package python things.
I've been trying to do that for a couple of years, but Debian's Python Policy is just too much for me. Call me lazy, $DEITY knows I know I am, but I just can't cope with so much and dense info.
So, I tried to look for automatical tools to do it. Two years
ago the only thing I could find was (WARNING: ugly colors ahead)
packer,
but its vitality is rather low: according to FreshMeat, it was
added on Dec 2005 and last updated on Feb 2006. I started using it,
but its interface is not very good, so realeasing further versions
was not an easy task. Also, I think now it's very out-of-date to
Debian Policy.
This week I tried again, now trying to find something that could
use either python-support or
python-central to manage the python package, and also
that it used the info from setuptool's
setup.py, but I only could find some incomplete
tutorials.
So John explained it to me. It really comes down to using
dh_make, the starting point of debhelper.
Before you run it you have to make sure everything's in place for
it. That means to put the code in a directory which name is the
name of the program, followed by a dash, followed by the version,
like psync-0.4.1.
Now you just run dh_make --createorig, who asks
what kind of package you're about to build. Normaly a 'single
binary' is enough. It will show you some info it has gathered from
your environment, about who you are and what package you're
building. This will also create a .orig directory in
the parent directory (making if a sibling of the current one) from
the current directory, so make sure no cruft goes in. Here is the
point were if there is no setup.py file, you just add
it with the proper
info.
This creates the debian directory with a lot of
files on it. Those who already read about Debian packaging will
find familiar files. If you're not, the best way to figuring out
what goes where is the proper Debian Policy.
The first file you have to edit is
control; just make sure that you add
python and python-support as BuildDeps
and ${python:Depends} as Deps.
The
rules file is a little more complicated. It's a
Makefile with several targets. configure
must have the commands needed to configure the project prior to
building it. Most python programs don't need this or the next one,
which is the build target. This one obviously should
have the commands needed to build the program. The third one is
clean, where you usualy just neet to replace the
boilerplate $(MAKE) clean with python setup.py
clean. The install target will need a
python setup.py install
--prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/psync/usr. Just check out the
$(MAKE) invocation and you'll figure it out.
The last one is the binary-arch target. This one
has lots of calls to debhelper functions. If you read
it carefully, you'll see a dh_python call, commented
out. Don't use it, use dh_pysupport. This is the hook
for python-support support. This is the part that does
all the magic to make sure that you don't break the Debian Python
Policy. And that's mostly it. You can comment out a couple of
dh_ functions, like dh_strip or
dh_shlibdeps (shared libs deps).
Another file to edit, and this might be the last one, is
changelog. This one has a particular format, so I
suggest to use dch from the devscripts
package. The one you'll find is a template the dh_make
left for you to fill. You just need to put the bug number of the
ITP
bug. What, you haven't send an ITP but yet? Well, do it! Then you can use
dch -a to add new entries to the current version's
entries, dch -i to increment the Debian version and
maybe dch -r to update the date at the bottom of the
current version. See its manpage for further options.
Last, there is some junk in the debian directory,
most of them the *.ex files, which are just examples.
You can safely get rid of them, or read them to see if they suit
you.
The next step is to build it. This is as easy-peasy as running
dpkg-buildpackage. This will build a .deb
file, a .dsc file, a .orig.tar.gz file, a
.diff.gz and a .changes file in the
parent directory. This is the outcome of all the work you've done
so far, but is not finished yet. You better run
lintian on the .dsc file and the
.deb file. If you add the -i option
you'll get some explanation on why you failed to give a proper,
no-lint package.
So, that's it. It's a longish post, but should get you up
packaging python apps in a few minutes. The are still a few
problems: you end up dup'ing info: in the setup.py
file and in various files in the debian directory.
Maybe I'll hack something to workaround this.
De acuerdo a la FAQ, los mapas se actualizan los miércoles. Habrá que esperar...
De acuerdo a la FAQ, los mapas se actualizan los miércoles. Habrá que esperar...
Map Junkie. Ése es el título que me corresponde por haber estado más de 5 horas culo en silla agregando calles, avenidas y otras sarazas al OpenStreetMap de mi querida ciudad natal. Completé un poco Nueva Córdoba, hice casi toda Ciudad Universitaria y estiré las avenidas que luego se transforman en rutas: Vélez Sarsfield, Colón, Juan B. Justo, Núñez, la ruta 20, Pajas Blancas, y muchas las supercalles/subavenidas de esta ciudad. Hasta hice algunos pedazos de barrios donde me gusta el trazado de calles (nada de esos aburridos cuadriculados, sino más cercano a las callecitas de Europa).
¿Cómo hice todo eso sin un GPS y sin mover el culo de la silla? Simple, el sitio tiene un flash applet que te muestra de fondo las fotos satelitales de Yahoo! Y la verdad es que anda muy muy bien, hasta me anduvo en konq4 y todo.
Es notable todo lo que conozco de mi ciudad, los pocos nombres de calles que recuerdo (¡Quiero un auto! ¿Nadie tiene uno que le sobre?) y lo muuucho que falta por hacer. El resultado no parece estar disponible ya ya, aunque cuando estás por empezar a usar el applet te advierten que estás editando los datos en vivo. Mañana veremos qué pasa...
Map Junkie. Ése es el título que me corresponde por haber estado más de 5 horas culo en silla agregando calles, avenidas y otras sarazas al OpenStreetMap de mi querida ciudad natal. Completé un poco Nueva Córdoba, hice casi toda Ciudad Universitaria y estiré las avenidas que luego se transforman en rutas: Vélez Sarsfield, Colón, Juan B. Justo, Núñez, la ruta 20, Pajas Blancas, y muchas las supercalles/subavenidas de esta ciudad. Hasta hice algunos pedazos de barrios donde me gusta el trazado de calles (nada de esos aburridos cuadriculados, sino más cercano a las callecitas de Europa).
¿Cómo hice todo eso sin un GPS y sin mover el culo de la silla? Simple, el sitio tiene un flash applet que te muestra de fondo las fotos satelitales de Yahoo! Y la verdad es que anda muy muy bien, hasta me anduvo en konq4 y todo.
Es notable todo lo que conozco de mi ciudad, los pocos nombres de calles que recuerdo (¡Quiero un auto! ¿Nadie tiene uno que le sobre?) y lo muuucho que falta por hacer. El resultado no parece estar disponible ya ya, aunque cuando estás por empezar a usar el applet te advierten que estás editando los datos en vivo. Mañana veremos qué pasa...